dc.contributor.author |
Akter, Minara |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-02-13T05:23:42Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-02-13T05:23:42Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-05-15 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Includes Bibliographical References (74-91 p.) |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1027 |
|
dc.description |
This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Pain and disability persisting for more than 3 months called chronic low
back pain (CLBP), and it’s a major health problem with enormous economic and
social costs. Generally, incidents of back pain most commonly occur in between ages
25 and 50 years and chronic low back pain over 70%-80% of adult population, the
maximum prevalence being around the age of 55-65 years, with a 5-10% incidence at
adult age. Objectives: To identify whether segmental stabilization exercise with
conventional therapy program or only conventional therapy program is more effective
for the treatment of chronic low back pain patients. Methodology: It was Randomized
control Trail (RCT). 30 patients with chronic low back pain were randomly assigned
into two groups from outdoor musculo-skeletal unit, CRP. Among them 15 patients
were assigned into experimental group received segmental stabilization exercises with
conventional therapy and another 15 into control group received only conventional
therapy. Total treatment sessions were twelve comprising of 3 sessions per week for 4
weeks. Double blinding procedure was used during data collection. Outcome
measurement tools: Dallas Pain Quessnaire with Visual analogue Scale was used to
measure pain, manual muscle testing to measure muscle strength and ODI to measure
low back disability. Analysis of data: Between group analysis of muscle strength and
back disability was calculated by Mann – Whitney U test and Pain (continuous data)
by unpaired t test. Within group analysis of muscle strength and back disability was
calculated by Wilcoxon test and pain (continuous data) by paired t test and test was
done using SPSS version 16. Results: The main findings of this study is in case of
pain intensity in different functional position in experimental group all variables come
highly significant but in control group all the variables come significant except hurt
when walking, and change work place come non-significant. So, we concluded that
segmental stabilization exercise with conventional therapy is effective reducing pain
in different functional position. In case of muscle strength within group comparison of
flexor and extensor muscle strength come significant improvement in both
experimental and control group but in experimental group come highly significant
changes. In between group experimental and control mean difference is same that
means in case of between group null hypotheses is accepted. In case of ODI
quessnaire both experimental and control group come significant improvement but in
experimental group come highly significant. The result of the study find out that
segmental stabilization exercise with conventional therapy is more effective than only
conventional therapy and the duration was total 4 weeks 12 sessions for chronic low
back pain. Conclusion: This research showed that segmental stabilization exercises
combined with conventional therapy was more effective than only conventional
therapy for patients with chronic low back pain.
Key words: Chronic low back pain,Segmental stabilization exercise and Conventional
therapy. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Chronic low back pain |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Segmental stabilization exercise |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conventional therapy. |
en_US |
dc.title |
The effectiveness of segmental stabilization exercise with conventional therapy and only conventional therapy for chronic low back pain patients. |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |