DSpace Repository

Compare the efficacy between conventional physiotherapy and unilateral ankle foot orthosis (AFO) among patients with stroke suffering from gait dysfunction

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Munmun, Nasrin Akther
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-14T03:05:59Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-14T03:05:59Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11-15
dc.identifier.citation Includes bibliographical references (page 63-69) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1226
dc.description This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Stroke is defined as sudden onset of focal neurological deficit lasting more than 24 hours. The most common cause of long-term impairments is a stroke. 0.3% of people had a stroke. The gait of patients with stroke was characterized by decreased velocity and cadence, and increased gait cycle and double limb support. For correction of gait dysfunction, some treatment has been developed, including unilateral AFO and conventional physiotherapy. Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy between conventional physiotherapy and unilateral ankle foot orthosis among stroke patients suffering from gait dysfunction. Methodology: The design was a quantitative pre experimental study that followed the stroke patient with gait dysfunction who were receiving treatment from CRP and prescribed for AFO. Total 20 patients were taken according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. Data were collected by semi structured questionnaires; TUG test, 6MWT and Gait parameters were used to evaluate and repeated measure ANOVA was used to evaluate the outcome. Results: This study was found that both conventional physiotherapy and AFO had beneficial effects on the improvement of walking dysfunction of stroke patient. In comparison of conventional physiotherapy and baseline data, conventional physiotherapy was more significant (TUG, P<0.010; 6MWT, P<0.012; STPL, P<0.00; STDL, P<0.00; Speed, P<0,014) also, in comparison of conventional physiotherapy and AFO, AFO shows some significant result (TUG, P<0.003; 6MWT, P<0.047; STPL, P<0.00; STDL, P<0.00; Speed, P<0.039). Discussion: The study showed significant difference among the three levels of data. Conventional physiotherapy and AFO both are significant from baseline data for gait dysfunction of stroke patient. Also, between conventional physiotherapy and AFO, AFO shows some significant result for improvement of gait dysfunction among stroke patient but AFO could showed more significant result if it used with conventional physiotherapy. Limitation: Samples were very small in number; study duration was also limited and data was collected only from CRP which was not sufficient enough for the study to generalize the wider population. Conclusion: It can be concluded that both conventional physiotherapy and unilateral AFO is effective for gait dysfunction of stroke patient. Keywords: AFO, Conventional physiotherapy, TUG, 6MWT, Gait parameter, ANOVA. Total word count: 10600 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.subject Ankle Foot Orthosis en_US
dc.subject Conventional physiotherapy en_US
dc.subject TUG en_US
dc.subject Six-Minute Walk Test en_US
dc.subject Gait parameter en_US
dc.subject ANOVA. en_US
dc.title Compare the efficacy between conventional physiotherapy and unilateral ankle foot orthosis (AFO) among patients with stroke suffering from gait dysfunction en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account