Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to find out the effectiveness of taping with
conventional physiotherapy compare to only conventional physiotherapy for
tennis elbow. Objectives: To compare pain intensity at rest, at forceful wrist
extension, during forceful grip, during cozen test, at resisted middle finger
extension, during palpation at affected site before and after conventional
physiotherapy with taping and conventional physiotherapy alone in patients with
tennis elbow. Methodology: 7 patients with tennis elbow were selected and
randomly assigned to taping with conventional physiotherapy group and 7 patients
to the only conventional physiotherapy group for this randomize control trial
study. The study was conducted at musculoskeletal department of CRP, savar.
Visual analogue scale was used to measure pain intensity in different functional position. Unrelated "t" test used to compare the result. Results: Following
treatment the study found that the experimental group showed a significant
improvement in case of pain at forceful wrist extension (p<0.05), pain during
forceful grip (p<0.05), pain on cozen test (p<0.05), pain on forceful middle finger
extension (p<0.025) & pain during palpation (p<0.025). Only in case of resting
pain, reduction of pain intensity was not found to be significant. Conclusion: This
experimental study shows that taping with conventional physiotherapy is more
effective than conventional physiotherapy alone for patients with tennis elbow.
Description:
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to find out the effectiveness of taping with conventional physiotherapy compare to only conventional physiotherapy for tennis elbow.
Methodology: 7 patients with tennis elbow were selected and randomly assigned to taping with conventional physiotherapy group and 7 patients to the only conventional physiotherapy group for this randomize control trial study.