DSpace Repository

Comparison between trigger point compression and trigger point pressure release on upper active trapezius trigger point for mechanical neck pain

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shawon, Afroza Alam
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-18T04:43:41Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-18T04:43:41Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-19
dc.identifier.citation Includes bibliographical references (page 52-58) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/787
dc.description This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. en_US
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To find out the effectiveness of trigger point compression and trigger point pressure release on upper active trapezius trigger point for mechanical neck pain. Objectives: To assess the effects of pain, range of motion and functional outcome of neck after applying the trigger point compression and trigger point pressure release exercise. Methodology: The study design was quantitative clinical trial. 30 participants with neck pain were allocated (based on inclusion and exclusion criteria). The age range was 18-60 years. They were divided in two groups named as trigger point compression and trigger point pressure release. Each group contained 15 participants. They received 8 sessions of treatment. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), neck pain disability index scale (NDI) and measurement of range of motion were used in this study to see the effectiveness in pretest and posttest way. NPRS was used to measure the pain intensity in different functional position, goniometer was used to measure the range of motion and NDI was used to measure the functional outcome. Result: Following treatment the study was found that the trigger point compression group showed better improvement than trigger point pressure release group. In Trp compression group the pain intensity, range of motion and functional outcome of neck showed significant improvement where p value was <0.05. In Trp pressure release group didn’t show that much improvement like Trp compression group where p value was >0.05. But both groups showed significant improvement in functional outcome (p<0.05). Though both treatments were effective in functional outcome, it was accepted in this study that trigger point compression is superior to trigger point pressure release for mechanical neck pain. Conclusion: This quantitative clinical trial study shows that trigger point compression is more effective than trigger point pressure release for mechanical neck pain. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh en_US
dc.subject Mechanical neck pain. en_US
dc.title Comparison between trigger point compression and trigger point pressure release on upper active trapezius trigger point for mechanical neck pain en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account